Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:20

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
No Man's Sky Gets A Massive Switch 2 Upgrade And It's All Free - Kotaku
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
An Optometrist Is Begging People To Stop This Common Habit ASAP - AOL.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Boisson Beats Andreeva, Updated French Open Women's Bracket at Roland-Garros - Bleacher Report
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What song are you listening to right now? What does it mean to you?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Fuga eaque dolorum deserunt omnis velit.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
A Cosmic Tech Mystery Results in Literal Lost Souls in This Sci-Fi Short Story - Gizmodo
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.